**Former Ohio State President Kristina Johnson Gets a Medal—But Does She Really Deserve It?**
Kristina Johnson, the former president of Ohio State University, has been awarded the prestigious Presidential Medal. While this accolade is meant to honor individuals who have made significant contributions to their fields, some are questioning whether Johnson truly deserves such recognition or if it’s simply another case of political favoritism.
Johnson served as the 16th president of Ohio State from 2020 to 2024. During her time in office, she faced numerous challenges, including navigating the COVID-19 pandemic and managing the university’s transition to online learning. While she certainly dealt with difficult circumstances, some critics argue that her tenure lacked any real groundbreaking achievements. Her leadership was marked by debates over tuition hikes, staff layoffs, and a perceived lack of transparency in decision-making processes. These controversies led many to question whether her time at the helm of such a prominent institution was truly exemplary.
Moreover, Johnson’s record in higher education is a mixed bag. Before her role at Ohio State, she served as chancellor of the State University of New York (SUNY), where she was involved in a similar set of challenges. While she was praised for her work in technology and innovation, her leadership at SUNY also faced criticism over budget cuts and poor student retention rates. So, what exactly has she done to warrant a Presidential Medal?
The reality is that Johnson’s recognition could be more about political connections than actual accomplishments. Many critics point out that her career has been closely tied to powerful figures in both academia and politics, raising doubts about whether the award is truly a reflection of her personal achievements or a reward for her ability to navigate the corridors of power.
Of course, no one can deny that Johnson has had some influence, but when compared to others who have received the Presidential Medal, one has to ask: does she truly stand out as someone who reshaped higher education or made a lasting impact on society?
This award, like many others, serves as a reminder of the complicated and often controversial world of accolades, where the line between merit and favoritism can seem alarmingly thin. For many, it’s hard to ignore the suspicion that Johnson’s medal might just be another example of politics at play.
